C101 vs C102: When the Purity Grade Matters
September 26, 2026
Two grades, both called oxygen free copper, both around 101 percent IACS, both machining identically. Buyers ask whether the difference is real. It is, but it is not where most people look for it.
What is actually different
C10100, OFE, oxygen free electronic. Minimum 99.99 percent copper, with tight limits on a defined list of residual elements and a very low oxygen content. Produced and certified under controlled conditions for applications where purity is measured.
C10200, OF, oxygen free. Minimum 99.95 percent copper, oxygen free without the same tight residual element control.
That is the whole difference. One is a purity and certification grade, the other is oxygen free copper without the paperwork.
| C10100 OFE | C10200 OF | |
|---|---|---|
| Copper minimum | 99.99 percent | 99.95 percent |
| Oxygen | Very low, controlled | Low |
| Residual element limits | Specified | Less restrictive |
| Conductivity | About 101 percent IACS | About 101 percent IACS |
| Machinability | 20 | 20 |
| Hydrogen embrittlement | Resistant | Resistant |
| Typical use | UHV, accelerator, hydrogen brazed, certified | General oxygen free work |
Published typical values, not a promise from any shop.
When the difference matters
Ultra high vacuum and accelerator components. Outgassing and inclusion behaviour are what you are paying for, and the specification will name C10100. Do not accept a substitution.
Certified conductivity or purity. If a certificate has to show the residual element limits, only C10100 carries them.
Hydrogen brazing. Both are oxygen free and both resist hydrogen embrittlement. Either works for that property alone, and the drawing decides which by naming it.
Anything where the buyer’s own specification says C10100. Then it is C10100, because a substitution is a nonconformance whether or not it would have performed.
When it does not
For an oxygen free part where nobody is measuring outgassing or residual elements, C10200 does the same job, is often easier to source and may be cheaper. This covers a surprising amount of work that is specified C10100 out of habit.
The trap
Stockists and some shops quote the two as interchangeable, and in most applications they are. The trap is a drawing that says C10100, a shop that buys C10200 because it is on the shelf, and a certificate that says C10200 at first article. That is a rejected part even though it would have worked.
The fix is one line on the drawing. Either “C10100, no substitution” or “C10100 or C10200 acceptable”. Silence gets you whichever bar was closest.
What to write
Oxygen free electronic copper, UNS C10100,
ASTM B187, temper O61. No substitution.
Material certificate EN 10204 3.1 required.
Or, when the purity level is not itself a requirement:
Oxygen free copper, UNS C10200 or C10100,
ASTM B187, temper O61.
Reference pages: C10100 and C10200. The vacuum rules that usually drive the choice are in oxygen free copper for vacuum and UHV, and reading the certificate is covered in copper material certificates.
Frequently asked questions
Do C101 and C102 machine differently?
No. Both are oxygen free pure copper and both behave the same at the tool: gummy, burr prone, machinability around 20. The difference is at the mill, in purity control and certification, not on the shop floor.
Can a shop substitute C102 for C101?
Only if your drawing allows it. Stockists often quote them interchangeably. If your part is a certified vacuum or accelerator component specified as C10100, a substitution is a nonconformance regardless of whether it would have worked.
Which one should I specify by default?
If the application is ultra high vacuum, hydrogen brazing or anything certified, C10100. If you simply want oxygen free copper and the purity level is not itself a requirement, C10200 is acceptable and usually easier to buy.
Need a quote for this part?
Send the drawing. We match you with up to 3 copper shops and reply within 24 business hours.
Get matched with a copper machining shop